Law school counterpunches

Graduate school counterpunches Graduate school counterpunches As more law offices join the Morgan Lewis fleeting trend, dropping their late spring partner programs (an advancement Legal OnRamps Paul Lippe compared to Armageddon), its no uncertainty fulfilling to certain understudies to see one graduate school strike back, though with a blow that is more motion than punch. As Above the Law reports today, Fordham Law School has prohibited Reed Smith from its grounds for a long time due to the organizations absence of demonstrable skill in belatedly pulling out of the nearby enrolling process this year (the firm is as yet facilitating a late spring program; it simply chose not to meet at Fordham to staff it).In related news, Lippe offers more thoughts on how graduate schools may better get ready legal advisors for what's to come. While he makes various valid statements, his reason strikes me as unduly tight, centered for what it's worth around corporate clientsthats OK on the off chance that you take a gander at law as only a help industry, yet I concur with the remarks by Ray Campbell (visiting teacher at Penn State) proposing that the investigation of law is in factand ought to bemore: Is being an attorney pretty much serving paying customers? Not to reduce the significance of offering marvelous support to customers, however I think a legal advisor's obligations are more nuanced than that. You can be an incredible, customer situated attorney and watch out for the greater game, yet you reduce the calling and short sell what graduate schools need to do in the event that you take too thin a perspective on a legal counselor's job in the public arena.- posted by vera